Drive-By Criticisms vs. In-Depth Responses

On Fence-Sitters, and Sound-Bite Criticisms vs. In-Depth, Substantive Defenses

By Ken K. Gourdin

In an effort to lure anyone who might be on the fence into disbelief, some critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are fond of leveling drive-by, sound-bite criticisms of the Church and of its truth claims which require more in-depth analysis to rebut adequately. However, once those on the fence has been convinced by such shallow criticisms, often, they are unpersuaded by the substantive responses (indeed, they are less likely to take the time and effort necessary even to consider such responses).

I once commented on this phenomenon at Mormon Dialogue and Discussion. Not that this matters, but other Board members can give a poster “reputation points” or “rep points” for responses that they deem particularly witty, insightful, and so on. This post is my highest reputation content, having received 15 such points, one each from 15 other posters.

While, in this instance, the topic is religion, the phenomenon this post describes is generalizable well beyond that particular subject. One who knows just enough to be dangerous about some subject – whether that subject be science, philosophy, law, et cetera – might make a drive-by comment that persuades those who, in their lack of knowledge, had been sitting on the fence regarding some issue, and it then becomes difficult or impossible for someone more who is knowledgeable, about the issue and/or about the subject, to change the “former fence-sitter’s” mind.

I commented thus:

This isn’t intended as a criticism of you specifically and personally, [screen name redacted]. It’s simply a general observation of one advantage enjoyed by doubters, critics, skeptics, the disaffected, et cetera (pick your word) over believers: unfortunately, sound bites are more effective at luring those who are on the fence into disbelief than substantive analysis is at persuading those who are on the fence to believe, but it’s not possible to refute sound bite criticisms with sound bite rebuttals in return.  Critics know this, and they take full advantage of it.


About kenngo1969

Just as others must breathe to live, I must write. I have been writing creatively almost ever since I learned to write, period! I have written fiction, book- and article-length nonfiction, award-winning poetry, news, sports, features, and op-eds. I hope, one day, to write some motivational nonfiction, a decent-selling novel, a stage play, and a screen play.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s